Ever since her grisly demise at the end of an executioner’s blade in
1793, her name has become synonymous with ostentatious luxury by the
super rich and indifference to the hardships of the poor. Whether such
criticism was deserved remains a source of some debate even to this day.
Certainly, she was a byproduct of her environment: born into nobility
and opulence, she was no different than thousands of other women of the
era born into such a high station in life. That she would lose her head
on the guillotine for it, however, seems not only a bit excessive but
most likely undeserved. Obviously her and her husband, King Louis XVI,
had simply become a target for all the inequities and injustices the
royal system was known for, making them forever symbols of the people’s
rejection of the old monarchial form of government that had been in
place since antiquity. In essence, she was a victim of incredibly bad timing;
had she been born a half century earlier probably no one would have
heard of her. Born when and where she was and considering the political
climate of her era, she becomes famous not only as a symbol of affluent
indifference and the consequences thereof, but for being the first
female monarch ever to be executed—a probably undeserved and certainly
unsought fate if ever there was one.
No comments:
Post a Comment